Pedro Sánchez preferred to celebrate the tranquility of his wife's birthday before she was at the funeral for the victims, the government delegation entered through the back door and Leticia Ortiz Rocasolano refused to cross herself.
If you want to see it again, you don't have much water, isn't it aerated? Who would welcome us? Are there going to be any countries with Welcome Spanish shelters?
Those who come to live in Spain from other countries have the consolation that if they don't like it they can return to theirs again, but when they kick us out of ours, where are we going to go? Who is going to welcome us? Because of course this is completely unbearable.
Let's portray the leading class of this country, and let's talk about Leticia Ortiz Roca Solano. You can see the focus on this part of the AliExpress Republic. They are starting to get fed up and they express it on social networks.
It is not the first time that this lady refuses to cross herself in a Catholic ceremony, but for some reason people are already beginning to raise their voices. And what you see is an image of the controversy. This is what is bothering a lot of people. They both arrive, he crosses himself, she doesn't refuse, once again, what work did it cost you? Your hand is so heavy.
It is true that by protocol she was not obliged, it is true, but you are not there by protocol, you are supposed to accompany the victims and if the king has no problem crossing himself, I don't know why she doesn't.
What is he coming for? Those who defend it argue first that it was not mandatory. Okay! Empathy is not mandatory, obviously you have it or you don't have it, and secondly, it is already coherent because it is agnostic, by the way, the majority that is defending this lady are left-wing accounts that already tell you a lot about the character, because those who defend you define you.
If you don't do it because of your beliefs, where were your beliefs when you did the above? Here yes. Here you cross yourself and put your foot on your knee because you were risking the royal house, here yes, here you are interested in crossing yourself, you have no problem and if you openly say that you are not a believer and those who defend you say that you are coherent, where was the coherence this day? Did you fool people? Did you pretend to process a religion that you don't process in order to gain access to the royal house? because as far as I know, when you get married for a religious rite it is because you process it.
Were you lying that day? Did you cheat? Or does coherence suddenly appear to you when you have already tied up the royal house? And on the other hand, if it costs you so much to make a gesture towards the people, towards those who make up the country that pays you for your cosmetic surgeries, it costs you so much, because, for example, putting on a veil costs you very little.
Here you are not coherent because of your agnosticism, it is difficult for us to cross ourselves, but it does not cost us anything to put on a veil in the kingdom of Morocco, because as far as I know it is the queen of Spain, not the queen of Morocco, if you put on the veil there out of respect, out of empathy, because I am worth it, listen, do the same in a ceremony where there are 45 fatalities.
If you are consistent and do not cross or say publicly that protocol is not necessary, do not wear the veil and do not do it here either, having gotten married in one of those courts that you like so much, those secular ceremonies that are so republican, do it, but once we have already tied up, then yes, then now yes. Now we refuse because we already have the royal house tied up.
