The 1.4 burned is from the source you mentioned, so why incorrect?
Please differentiate between that we were burning through buying panda token miners. And it's minted panda gets burned.
https://hivehub.dev/tx/9b0764c7d1a97ba5f9f904b4d65e4d4da237eac1
Here is more information about it:
All You Need To Know About $PANDAMINER
https://peakd.com/panda-x/@panda-x/dollarpanda-and-dollarpandaminer-token-launch-or-announcement
The token is completely illiquid, if there is NO buy offer
This is why we recently changed burn model so we can offer more and better buy back and burn wall. It's just a temporary issue that will be fixed. Check @panda-burn account to know how much we can provide as buy back wall. It still has good tokenomics to provide continuous buy walls.
if the missing 30% ever can be compensated by the somewhat obscure tecenomic is a huge question mark!
Keep in mind that there r curation projects that offer 80% of curation returns as well. Pandex gives 70% while also offer much more benefits in long run.
Check out our "compound fund" accounts to have a look if
$114.72 in Compound Fund HP $38.427 in an Additional Compound Fund
Justifies token supply and it's price.
Panda token was marketed as a long term investment option. Please observe it for few more months to see it's true colours. Or see how much we compound on weekly bases.